Tipping the Scales of Justice: The difference between a Strickland appointee and an FBI agent

Former FBI Agent Mark Rossini pleaded guilty Monday for doing what Helen Jones-Kelley did – using a government database for a private purpose. Not only did Rossini lose his job, he faces five years in prison.

Jones-Kelley received a 30-day suspension, and will return to her $140,000-a-year job directing Gov. Ted Strickland’s largest agency later this month. Jones-Kelley was disciplined for ordering her subordinates to snoop in government databases for damning information on “Joe the Plumber,” who had caused her favored presidential candidate embarrassment.

Rossini, a sworn law enforcement officer, arguably has a greater duty of fidelity than a mere political appointee. Rossini clearly has a greater sense of honor: He admitted his wrongdoing, and resigned his position of trust -- although, it must be said, the FBI has absolutely no sense of humor about these things.

Jones-Kelley, a "maxed out" contributor to the President-elect, has yet to even apologize for her conduct. Her most recent statement tried to make the case that her conduct was righteous -- she claimed that she snooped on Joe the Plumber as part of a routine inquiry for people who were suddenly thrust into the spotlight. She offered scant evidence to support the routine nature of her act, and the Inspector General found neither her claim nor her act justified.

In the law, this is called a lack of remorse, and it is a factor judges are to take into account to support a harsher sentence. Even after the public rebuke of the Inspector General -- and the mild disappointment expressed by the Governor -- Jones-Kelley has yet to so much as offer the shallow mea culpa of the wrongdoer who got caught.

When she returns to work, the media should demand an answer to the question: Do you feel you did anything wrong?

And, they could ask Gov. Strickland why she deserves much better treatment than a career FBI agent.